Hey List, I am reading https://systemd.io/BOOT_LOADER_SPECIFICATION/ and https://systemd.io/AUTOMATIC_BOOT_ASSESSMENT/
I want to use Type 2 unified images because of SecureBoot. But I want a 2-partition model a-la CoreOS, where I rollback when the node isn't healthy. I wanted to use automatic boot assessment to implement this mechanism. Where I have 2 EFI images in $BOOT/loader/entries/; one loading the first partition in its cmdline; and the other loading the second partition in its cmdline. But then I noticed that https://systemd.io/AUTOMATIC_BOOT_ASSESSMENT/ only talks about files in $BOOT/loader/entries/ and not $boot/EFI/Linux/ Does this mean automatic boot assessment doesn't work for Type #2 entries? Or will it work for that as well if I name my EFI images in a similar naming scheme as the entries in $BOOT/loader/entries If not; is there a good reason why not and is it something that is worth implementing? Kind regards, Arian -- *Zeta Project Germany GmbH *l Rosenthaler Straße 40, <https://maps.google.com/?q=Rosenthaler+Stra%C3%9Fe+40,%C2%A0+10178+Berlin,%C2%A0+Germany&entry=gmail&source=g>10178 Berlin, <https://maps.google.com/?q=Rosenthaler+Stra%C3%9Fe+40,%C2%A0+10178+Berlin,%C2%A0+Germany&entry=gmail&source=g> Germany <https://maps.google.com/?q=Rosenthaler+Stra%C3%9Fe+40,%C2%A0+10178+Berlin,%C2%A0+Germany&entry=gmail&source=g> Geschäftsführer/Managing Director: Morten J. Broegger, Dylan Riley HRB 149847 beim Handelsregister Charlottenburg, Berlin VAT-ID DE288748675
_______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
