On Mi, 25.10.17 04:52, 林自均 ([email protected]) wrote: > Hi Lennart, > > Yes, it makes sense to me. Thank you for your explanation. > > However, I still have a question about it. If the general goal is to > minimize synchronization points, why don't we convert more active targets > into passive targets? For example: not all machines have swap, so can the > swap.target be a passive target to avoid unnecessary sync point? I guess > there must be a reason not to do so, but I don't know what it is.
Well, targets are not just sync points, they are also ways how to group things. swap.target is a way to pull in all swap devices, local-fs.target a way to pull in all local file systems and so on. Lennart -- Lennart Poettering, Red Hat _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
