On Wed, Jun 07, 2017 at 05:26:21PM +0200, Krzysztof Jackiewicz wrote: > Thanks, for explanation. > > > - a collection of rpms, like a linux distro, including systemd.rpm, > > libcryptsetup.rpm, and thousands of other loosely coupled rpms > > → that's a mere aggregation, each of the thousands of components carries > > it's own license, each has to be satisfied separately > > It is mere aggregation as long as binary from systemd.rpm does not > link to a library from libcryptsetup.rpm. If it does then it's a > combination or a derivative work in terms of GPL and as such the > systemd.rpm should include a GPL license (and of course comply with > other GPL terms and conditions). Is that correct?
You need to consult a lawyer to get a definitive answer for this, please don't ask developers for legal advice :) good luck! greg k-h _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
