On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 8:31 PM, Chris Murphy <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 10:41 AM, Mantas Mikulėnas <[email protected]> > wrote: > > So the same applies to plymouth, IMO -- it should only mark itself > exempt if > > it runs from the initramfs and knows that it won't interfere. > > How is this exemption specified? Would it be part of the plymouth > packaging? > https://cgit.freedesktop.org/plymouth/commit/?id=9e5a276f322cfce46b5b2ed2125cb9ec67df7e9f -- Mantas Mikulėnas <[email protected]>
_______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
