On Mon, 18.07.16 14:51, Michael Biebl ([email protected]) wrote: > 2016-07-18 14:46 GMT+02:00 Lennart Poettering <[email protected]>: > > I'd really recommend them to switch to SIGRMIN+4 instead. Redefining > > the meaning of SIGPWR like they are doing is certainly a bad idea. > > > > Note that this is even documented here since a long time: > > > > https://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/systemd/ContainerInterface/ > > Hm, the wiki recommends to use SIGRMIN+3, not 4.
either is fine... One is "halt" and one is "poweorff"... In a container that's kinda the same thing... Lennart -- Lennart Poettering, Red Hat _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
