Am 28.06.2016 um 05:20 schrieb Kai Hendry:
On Mon, 27 Jun 2016, at 08:33 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:normally service level agreemnets contain basic prerequisites and if the are ignored the customers has to pay a penalty in case of support casesYou live in a different world to me.
you are doing something wrong when other idiot admins with a "only 80/443 syndrome" don't realize that at least 53 and 123 are important ports for basic services becomne your problem
Just going to follow up with a blog I found on the matter of “time over HTTPS”: http://phk.freebsd.dk/time/20151129.html Though he considers this method for sanity checking atm. https://twitter.com/bsdphk/status/747346942351544320 So it doesn't really validate my proposal as an authoritative source.
because HTTP is simply the wrong protocol and when you try to understand how the NTP protocol works you will realize that too
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
