Am 26.05.2016 um 16:38 schrieb Lennart Poettering:
On Thu, 26.05.16 13:46, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson ([email protected]) wrote:On 05/26/2016 09:36 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote:/usr is for the OS vendor really.Given that it's generally expected and wanted that application developers follow the os vendors packaging guideline and rules as possible in distribution and many 3rd party repositories reflect that, I have to ask what's your reasoning for limit this to OS vendor only?It's a shared namespace. Distros have enough problems already making sure that no two packages own the same names for their binaries, libraries, ... If you now allow multiple unrelated parties to all dump their own stuff in there, then you can only fail with that.
and *collide with the sysadmin* by install systemd-units in /etc/systemd/system as you recommended is better? thanks for overwrite my custom unit there and guess how my complaints sounds wehn this happen every random day by updates
NOBODY has ANY business to touch /etc/systemd/system-units as long he is not me and so *please* STOP recommend such a stupidity while Fedora now seems to catch a fix the few remaining packages built that wrong way
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
