On Mon, 16.05.16 04:24, Michael Biebl ([email protected]) wrote: > Hi,
> Any ideas, why simple tools like loginctl, busctl, hostnamectl require 300K+ ? > What's up with systemd-analyze? it embedds much of PID1's logic actually, in order to do unit file checking. > Could we move more common functionality into a shared, private library > to counter the constant growth? This has been discussed, and yeah, this should be a good thing to do. It's just a matter of doing it. A shared, but explicitly private library would be good. I figure it should be built from the stuff in src/shared and src/basic. This would mean it won't help in the systemd-analyze in case, but I think it's OK, given that that's a debugging tool. If anyone wants to make the necessary changes to makefile.am I'd be happy to merge this. (I figure either by including a version nr in the .so filename, or by using symbol versioning, we really should make sure that the .so is bumped on each release and we won't end up with new binaries accidentally linking against older .so versions or vice versa.) Lennart -- Lennart Poettering, Red Hat _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
