On 27 April 2016 at 10:41, Daniel Mack <[email protected]> wrote: > On 04/27/2016 12:29 AM, Felipe Sateler wrote: >> On Tue, 26 Apr 2016 17:28:34 +0200, Daniel Mack wrote: >> >>> Hi Michael, >>> >>> On 04/15/2016 11:00 PM, Daniel Mack wrote: >>>> On 04/15/2016 10:47 PM, Michael Biebl wrote: >>> >>>> Including the built results of systemd-initctl into your .deb packet is >>>> not a solution? Making that an extra package causes too much trouble, I >>>> totally agree. >>> >>> Did you further think about this idea, would that be a solution? >> >> I'm not sure I understood your proposal correctly, but each .deb package >> is built from one source package. This implies that systemd-initctl >> source would have to be somehow imported into the debian systemd source, > > Well, yes. At the same time when downstream patches are applied.
Ah, yes, I was confused by your mention of built-results. > >> and then used to build the shipped binary (ie, not importing the binary >> artifacts alone). > > I'm not sure if it's feasible, hence I'm asking. It should be doable via either a patch reverting the removal, or a plain import of the new systemd-initctl sources into the debian.tar.xz and built in a separate ./configure && make run. -- Saludos, Felipe Sateler _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
