10.03.2016 18:05, Francis Moreau пишет: > On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 10:19 AM, Andrei Borzenkov <[email protected]> wrote: >> 08.03.2016 11:33, Francis Moreau пишет: >>> On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 9:23 AM, Andrei Borzenkov <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>>> 08.03.2016 11:07, Francis Moreau пишет: >>>>> On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 7:51 AM, Andrei Borzenkov <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>>> 07.03.2016 10:04, Francis Moreau пишет: >>>>>>> Hello, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Sorry for the long delay. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 5:05 AM, Andrei Borzenkov <[email protected]> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> 26.02.2016 00:55, Francis Moreau пишет: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> But now I'm wondering how the following case is handled: a sysinit >>>>>>>>> script "a" has "Required-Start: b". But "b" is a native systemd >>>>>>>>> service. I don't think the tool that enable/disable sysv services can >>>>>>>>> enable and order correctly the native service. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> What difference does it make? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The difference is that in my current understanding nothing will pull >>>>>>> "b" in. >>>>>> >>>>>> That was answered in part you trimmed off. sysvinit never actively >>>>>> pulled "b" in either so nothing really changed here. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> In my understanding insserv is part of the sysvinit implementation. >>>>> >>>>> Therefore to enable a service with sysvinit, we do: >>>>> >>>>> - insserv a (this will create S<xx>a *and* S<yy>b" with yy < xx) >>>> >>>> That would be new to me. insserv creates links ("enables") exactly those >>>> services that you specify. So if you say "insserv a" you will get only >>>> "a" enabled; this /may/ rearrange other services including "b" if they >>>> are already enabled but this will not enable "b". >>>> >>> >>> That's how I understood Lennart's excerpt I was referring to previously. >>> >> >> Hmm ... I tested on SLES11 and indeed, while "insserv a" will not enable >> "b" it will refuse to enable "a" if "b" is not enabled. And conversely >> it will not disable "b" if "a" is enabled. >> >> So at least it tries to ensure that set of enabled services is consistent. > > Is this system uses systemd ? >
No; it is too old for this. It is classical sysvinit. _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
