On Mon, 22.06.15 10:36, Johannes Ernst ([email protected]) wrote: > What’s the difference between > machinectl start foo > and > systemctl start systemd-nspawn@foo > ? They look the same to me.
They are pretty much, as the man page even says. It's a bit nicer to user "machinectl start foo" though, since if foo contains weird chars, machinectl will apply the right escaping for you, which is particularly useful when you container names contain dashes. Also, machinectl start has its own PolicyKit action, which means you can grant that to specific users without having to grant them the right to start any kind of service. Lennart -- Lennart Poettering, Red Hat _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
