2015-06-19 16:38 GMT+02:00 Lennart Poettering <[email protected]>: > On Fri, 19.06.15 16:29, Michael Biebl ([email protected]) wrote: > >> > If something is not in shape we'll revert it. Regardless of the >> > general merits of the patch set: this one actually broke stuff, it >> > was incomplete. Either you make the man pages dynamic, or you ship >> > them pre-built. The patch set did both. That's broken, and hence has >> > no place in a release. And I'd much rather see that stuff removed >> > again than having to delay the release further. >> > >> >> Not amused, not amused at all. >> > >> > I am sorry you feel that way. >> > >> > I am not sure though what you suggest: delay releases until zero >> > bugfixes have been applied for a week? Well, that would mean we'd >> > never do releases again, sorry. We have to release some time. On >> >> Bullshit. That's been in master for a while and the justification for >> reverting appear to totally made up. > > I wasn't the one who reverted it or even involved in the > discussions. But what I saw is that the patch was borked, since it one > one hand tried to ship the man pages pre-built but also wanted to make > them different depending on ./configure runs. And that's just > *broken*.
The justification for the revert basically boil down to: let's make it as hard as possible and use systemd as a stick to force them to not use split-usr. The "arguments" for the for the patch being broken are completely made up. -- Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the universe are pointed away from Earth? _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
