On Thu, 28.05.15 13:02, Richard Maw ([email protected]) wrote:

> This is a superset of the functionality of unquote_first_word, allowing
> non-whitespace separators, and doesn't interpret quotes unless
> UNQUOTE_QUOTES is included in flags.

Hmm, makes sense, but I'd actually just have one function
extract_first_word() then, which replaces unquote_first_word() but has
the signature of your unescape_first_word(). It would take the
separators parameter, which would default to WHITESPACE if passed as
NULL. THe flags should all be renamed EXTRACT_xyz instead of
UNQUOTE_xyz then, and EXTRACT_UNQUOTE should be a prominent flag.

Then, all our current users of unquote_first_word() should be changed
to use this new call.

Does that make sense?

Lennart

-- 
Lennart Poettering, Red Hat
_______________________________________________
systemd-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel

Reply via email to