On Thu, 05.02.15 01:07, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek ([email protected]) wrote:
> > Just want to know why he didn't considered pushing this patch upstream. > > Apparently already two distros patch this downstream, so having a fix > > upstream would imho make sense. > > Because it was just a hack :) > > Maybe Lennart's idea with the sysv generator is a better thing. So, I have discussed this with Kay, David, Daniel, and co. And we kinda came to the conclusion that we might as well just drop the configurability where runlevel3-5.target point to. If we drop that, we can just keep them as symlink aliases in place, but the sysv generator won't create symlinks in them anymore. Instead it will create the right links directly in multi-user.target and graphical.target as necessary. I think that would be the simplest, easiest solution for the problem. Redefining runlevels in the systemd context is kinda a crazy idea, and we should probably just say goodbye to it... I am retty sure pretty much nobody made use of this anyway. Opinions? Lennart -- Lennart Poettering, Red Hat _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
