Hello all, it seems that the newly added `systemctl edit` command requires its arguments to be valid unit names.
This causes `edit` operation to fail in apparently valid use-cases like
systemctl edit [email protected]
or
systemctl edit [email protected]
In second case, the error message is especially cryptic:
"[email protected] ignored: not found".
Actually I understand what it does mean: systemctl asks the manager to show
unit's FragmentPath -> the manager tries to load the unit -> loading fails with
"File exists" because [email protected] is already instantiated.
(BTW, it's a separate question: is this failure valid or is it a bug?)
But well. I guess that `edit` operation should always work with unit files
directly, just like enable/disable commands do.
Is this all correct? Can anyone please comment on these two issues?
--
Ivan Shapovalov / intelfx /
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
