On Fri, 21.11.14 17:02, Lukas Nykryn ([email protected]) wrote:

> it seems to be a typo introduced by ebcf1f97de4f6b1580ae55eb56b1a3939fe6b602
> -                _r = selinux_access_check(_b, _m, _u->source_path 
> ?:_u->fragment_path, (permission), &_error); \
> +        ({ Unit *_unit = (unit); selinux_generic_access_check(bus,message, 
> _unit->fragment_path ?: _unit->fragment_path, permission,error); })

Looks good! Applied!

Lennart

-- 
Lennart Poettering, Red Hat
_______________________________________________
systemd-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel

Reply via email to