On Tue, 2014-11-18 at 19:32 +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote: > On Tue, 2014-11-11 at 16:46 +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote: > <snip> > > I am willing to take a patch for this, but then again, as I own a Yoga > > I might look into this myself too one day. > > If you can write the scaffolding for it, I'm happy writing the code that > talks to the accelerometer, and that would make it work on your Yoga. > I've already written that code once, and I should be able to transform > it into something mergeable. > > Do note that we would have to handle 3 types of accelerometers: > - IIO with ring buffer (the type supported by iio-sensor-proxy and in > the Yoga) > - polling IIO (the type used in cheap tablets such as mine) > - input device accelerometers (as present in the WeTab, and Dell Venue 8 > tablet, apparently)
I'll correct my own mail. We want to handle 4 types of accelerometers: - quaternion sensor IIO with ring buffer (the type present in some Yogas) - accelerometer IIO with ring buffer (the type supported by iio-sensor-proxy and in the Yoga as well) - polling IIO (the type used in cheap tablets such as mine) - input device accelerometers (as present in the WeTab) Given that range of devices, it makes less and less sense to me to put it in systemd. I think that I might start thinking about a D-Bus API, and expect interested desktops to use that instead of adding hardware specific code in systemd. What do you think? _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
