On Tue, 18.11.14 15:45, Vasiliy Tolstov ([email protected]) wrote: > 2014-11-18 14:40 GMT+03:00 Tom Gundersen <[email protected]>: > > This is on the TODO (still). Anything in particular you wonder about? > > > > Cheers, > > Hm. Does LLMNR can replace my needs - i want to able to resolve > hostnames via multicast (all my servers have only pure ipv6 (slaac) > addresses and statically assigned hostnames).
Yeah, that should just work already. LLMNR uses single-label names, hence resolving the unqualified hostname of local link-local peers should "just work" if resolved and nss-resolve are used. Note that link-local ipv6 addresses for the name resolution stuff aren't fun to use in Linux right now, as the glibc NSS eats up the scopeid, when a client wants to resolve a hostname and specifies an address family. THis has the effect that resolving to link-local IPv6 addresses via "ssh" will just work (since ssh makes no restrictions on the address family when resolving the hostname), but via "ping6" will actually fail (since ping6 specifies AF_INET6 as address family...). Also see for this issue: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1118723 Lennart -- Lennart Poettering, Red Hat _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
