>From Lennart Poettering, Thu 02 Oct 2014 at 16:07:03 (+0200) : > How precisely would you envision this to work? I mean, so far > "systemctl preset [email protected]" will precisely enable > "[email protected]"
That's exactly what I want; I have not tried systemctl preset [email protected], but in 'systemctl preset-all' it does not work (it only enables services that exist, not instanciated service). > , but you are expecting that "systemctl preset > [email protected]" would somehow result in enablement of [email protected] or > so? How would we even denote that in the rules files? No, I just want that enable [email protected] in a preset rule works with systemctl preset-all. Maybe I missed something and it already works? Thanks, Damien Robert _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
