On Wed, 13.08.14 13:07, Dave Reisner ([email protected]) wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 12:56:19PM -0400, Leonid Isaev wrote: > > This still doesn't explain why systemctl misses the cgroup information... > > Isn't this the same misfeature that causes other fields like _COMM to be > lost as well? The process goes away before journald can async read that > information from /proc. IIRC, this is supposed to be fixed in the kernel > via SO_PASSPROC[0].
Well, the problem here appears to be that *long-running* processes exist in the cgroup, but systemd still forgets about the cgroup... Lennart -- Lennart Poettering, Red Hat _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
