On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 11:31 PM, Stefan G. Weichinger <[email protected]> wrote: > Am 29.06.2014 23:24, schrieb Lennart Poettering: >> On Sun, 29.06.14 21:51, Kai Krakow ([email protected]) wrote: >>> # /sbin/fsck.btrfs /dev/sdb3 >>> If you wish to check the consistency of a BTRFS filesystem or >>> repair a damaged filesystem, see btrfs(8) subcommand 'check'. >> >> Is this an upstream thing? Or is that specific to your distro? >> >> It sounds really wrong to me to do something like what they are >> doing. Either they provide a real implementation, or they don't supply >> an implementation. Either is fine. But if they supply an implementation >> that justs prints a warning will simply mean that various tools >> (including systemd) will invoke it, for no reason. > > This is how gentoo currently implements things. > So the devs there should link it to /bin/true ? > We could open a bug for that at bugs.gentoo.org ...
IMHO both xfs and btrfs should just not ship a fsck helper at all, not even as a symlink. This workaround made sense at some point, but now I believe both systemd _and_ fsck itself can deal gracefully with a missing fsck helper. -t _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
