Am 06.06.2014 11:48, schrieb Jóhann B. Guðmundsson: > On 06/05/2014 05:00 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote: >> I think it would make sense to recommend that packagers and upstream >> packages adopt Restart=on-failure or Restart=on-abnormal (where the >> former is not appropriate) for all long-running daemons. However, this >> recommendation should be taken with a grain of salt, as for some >> services it might be a bad choice to just tape over problems and >> restarting it again on failure... Hence, this is really not something to >> blindly apply to all services on the world, but just a recommendation >> that individually should be considered. > > > We already have units in the wild upstream where the internet has > effectively spread ignorance once again which contain "Restart=Always" > when they should not
where do you see ignorance here? if there is running a service which should always run the only valid reason it's main process is stopped is a "systemctop stop whatever.service" for any long running service like web/mail/database servers "Restart=always" is what i expect as admin
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
