On 16/05/14 16:31, Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Fri, 16.05.14 03:20, Andy Kittner ([email protected]) wrote: > "Minimal" configurations? Are you kidding? > > If you want something "minimal", then just use devtmpfs, and don't > involve userspace at all in creating device nodes. This is not about > being "minimal" or not, this is about actually getting basic things > right... With "minimal" I was thinking more of not wanting udev in some situations, since the code in question explicitly mentions udev synchronisation. Sorry, that admittedly wasn't clear from the context I wrote it in.
As for devtmpfs itself, I don't know a situation where *I* wouldn't want it, of the top of my head, but the world is big and different people have different needs and IMHO it's up to the maintainers of each project whether or not they want to support those needs, or if they consider them not relevant enough to be worth that effort. That is all I was trying to say with this. > > Anyway, systemd is not compatible with Gentoo's way of doing LVM/DM, > sorry. Please file a bug against Gentoo. Um, the code in question is in upstream libdm, it has nothing to do with gentoo at all. Anyway, to bring this thread to a conclusion, since you don't consider this to be a dependency issue on systemd's side I just reported the issue on the LVM list, so let's see what they think about it. Regards, Andy _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
