On Thu, 06.03.14 09:16, Peter Rajnoha ([email protected]) wrote:

> Hi!
> 
> Based on SYSTEMD_READY definition, I think we should also mark loop
> devices with no file attached as not ready:
> 
>     rules: mark loop device as SYSTEMD_READY=0 if no file is attached
> 
>     Check existence of loop/backing_file in sysfs and mark loop
>     devices with SYSTEMD_READY if missing. Such loop files is
>     uninitialized and it's not ready for use yet (there's no file
>     attached).

Looks good!

Applied!

Thanks!

Lennart

-- 
Lennart Poettering, Red Hat
_______________________________________________
systemd-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel

Reply via email to