On Sat, Nov 09, 2013 at 01:27:46AM +0100, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote: > Hi folks, > > Forgive me in advance if the underlying reasonings behind these > questions are a bit naive...
What are those underlying reasonings? > Will kdbus make use of polkit? If partially so, will it be feasible to > have a normal desktop system with systemd+kdbus that does not require > polkit? Will polkit play a smaller role going forward? Will it be > phased out in any way? Why? > Perhaps tangentially related: will kdbus make use of dbus's current > xml definition files? Will all that xml somehow be a part of future > dbus situations? Why? > More generally: can all the not-so-nice stuff go away with the kdbus? What exactly is "not so nice"? How are you going to change all of the exising dbus users? thanks, greg k-h _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
