Hi, Speaking about ssh, are sd_bus_open_system_remote() and bus_connect_system_ssh() doing similar things? bus_connect_system_ssh expects the "unixexec:" support from dbus library. Can bus_connect_system_ssh be replaced with sd_bus_open_system_remote so we won't be dependent on latest (Seems like support has been in since 2012 :) https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35230 ) dbus library.
Thanks On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 3:50 PM, Lennart Poettering <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, 30.10.13 06:55, Simon Peeters ([email protected]) wrote: > >> bus_connect_system_ssh is shamelessly copied from Tom Gundersen's wip >> patches > > Tom's patches are merged them and I have now moved the SSH bits into the > public API of libsystem-bus. > > The PolKit transport we decided to remove, as nobody really was using > it, and it is better to add polkit auth to specific calls rather than > for the entire transport. Thus, during the conversion all polkit > transport should be removed from the tools and man pages. (To clarify: > only the *transport* i.e. the -P switch to the xyzctl tools should > go,not the general polkit supportfor authenticated operations). > > However, I just added support for connecting to the system bus of > arbitrary local containers. Also in the public API. All of the xyzctl > tools we have should make use of this. Ultimately this means that the > polkit transport is just "replaced" by the container transport. > > The machinectl tool does this correctly now, it's the example to base > the other tools on. > > Can I convince you to rebase the patches with this in mind? > > Lennart > > -- > Lennart Poettering, Red Hat > _______________________________________________ > systemd-devel mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
