On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 6:56 PM, Kay Sievers <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 6:45 PM, Umut Tezduyar <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> The global mirroring across trees makes no sense in the future. The >>> several independent trees will go away in the kernel next year, and >>> then systemd would not know what to do with an instruction like >>> DefaultControllers. >> >> I don't disagree that mirroring will not make sense in the future. >> Though, without global mirroring on cpuacct I don't understand how >> systemd-cgtop is expected to give cpu accounting information of >> individual services. Also without global mirroring on cpu control >> group, how would CPUShares=weight even work on any service. I am just >> confused. > > The kernel will only have one single hierarchy, all properties will be > located in this single tree.
Thats great but all in the future as you are also saying. > > Cgtop just reads the stuff from the controller *attributes* there, > instead of finding them in a separate controller *tree*. Actually, cgtop just reads the stuff from the cpuacct controller's hierarchy as of today and thats why it is not working for me. Thank you for your email but I think my confusion still remains. Umut > > Kay _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
