Hello: I have recently installed Fedora 19 on a Dell R620. I'm trying to grok the new device naming scheme put forth in systemd, but the results are a bit confusing.
This box has four onboard ports -- those are all correctly labelled as eno[1-4]. However, when I begin to add in PCIe cards, I don't see what I would expect. I've installed two PCIe cards: one two-port Intel e1000e and one two port SolarFlare Performa card. The e1000e works like I would expect: [root@s ~]# ethtool -i enp4s0f0 driver: e1000e version: 2.3.2-k firmware-version: 5.6-2 bus-info: 0000:04:00.0 supports-statistics: yes supports-test: yes supports-eeprom-access: yes supports-register-dump: yes supports-priv-flags: no [root@s ~]# ethtool -i enp4s0f1 driver: e1000e version: 2.3.2-k firmware-version: 5.6-2 bus-info: 0000:04:00.1 supports-statistics: yes supports-test: yes supports-eeprom-access: yes supports-register-dump: yes supports-priv-flags: no But, the SolarFlare produces an additional "device" along with the additional "function": [root@sunelkvm6 ~]# ethtool -i enp65s0f0 driver: sfc version: 3.2 firmware-version: 3.2.2.6124 bus-info: 0000:41:00.0 supports-statistics: yes supports-test: yes supports-eeprom-access: no supports-register-dump: yes supports-priv-flags: no [root@sunelkvm6 ~]# ethtool -i enp65s0f1d1 driver: sfc version: 3.2 firmware-version: 3.2.2.6124 bus-info: 0000:41:00.1 supports-statistics: yes supports-test: yes supports-eeprom-access: no supports-register-dump: yes supports-priv-flags: no I would expect to see enp65s0f0 and enp65s0f1, like the e1000e. Also, what constitutes a function and a device? I've read the decoder ring linked from: http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/systemd/PredictableNetworkInterfaceNames and I wasn't able to (easily) ascertain that. Thanks. _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
