On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 12:59 AM, Michael Demeter <[email protected]> wrote: > Yes is is very specific to Smack.
Sure. > Yes this has been tested here. It looks to me like *everything* will have that label now. This is an unconditional rule. > It is not included as a policy file when the image is built if Smack is not > enabled.. So will not affect anyone not using smack. That's not the point, the point is is if *belongs* into the systemd repo, not if it's *enabled* by default or not. From what I see, it's nothing really we should ship upstream. Also, it should not repeat the primary permissions settings from the default rules, that is just not right. Kay _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
