On Wed, 18.09.13 00:13, Jan Engelhardt ([email protected]) wrote: > > > On Tuesday 2013-09-17 21:03, Lennart Poettering wrote: > >On Fri, 13.09.13 15:15, Colin Guthrie ([email protected]) wrote: > >> > >> 'Twas brillig, and Lennart Poettering at 13/09/13 03:16 did gyre and > >> gimble: > >> > * The option "discard" (as known from Debian) is now > >> > synonymous to "allow-discards" in /etc/crypttab. In fact, > >> > the latter is preferred now (since it is easier to remember > >> > and type). > >> > >> I think you mean the "*former* is preferred now"? (I cannot see how > >> "allow-discards" is easier to type than "discard" ;) > > > >I clarified this in the NEWS file now. Of course "discard" is the > >preferred name as you guessed. > > Humm. That's unfortunate (in a way) that discards is the same > allow-discards. > > In pam_mount where discard too had been feature-requested (and then > implemented according to the way it sounds): "allow-discards" > _allows_ discarding, but only "discard" would make it such that > the filesystem issues discards to the block layer, leaving the > former case for manual discards.
Hmm, and what the is the underlying between the two in pam_mount? I mean, what does it translate to in mount options? Lennart -- Lennart Poettering - Red Hat, Inc. _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
