On Tue, 17.09.13 14:21, Chen Hanxiao ([email protected]) wrote: > + { "MemorySWLimit", bus_property_append_uint64, > "t", offsetof(CGroupContext, memsw_limit) }, > { "MemorySoftLimit", bus_property_append_uint64, > "t", offsetof(CGroupContext, memory_soft_limit) },
The patch looks fine in principle, but I really don't like the abbreviated name like this. Can we name this "MemorySwapLimit=" or so? Or "MemoryAndSwapLimit="? Or "MemoryPlusSwapLimit="? Or "MemoryIncludingSwapLimit="? "MemorySwapSumLimit="? I don't particularly like either of the latter really, anybody else got suggestions? The one that is the most descriptive fromt he above is probably "MemoryIncludingSwapLimit=", even if it sucks hard to type... Lennart -- Lennart Poettering - Red Hat, Inc. _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
