On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 8:13 PM, Darren Hart <[email protected]> wrote: > The EFI specification documents /EFI/BOOT/bootx64.efi for x86_64 > machines and /EFI/BOOT/bootia32.efi for ia32 machines. Update the auto > detection to allow for both. > > Signed-off-by: Darren Hart <[email protected]> > --- > src/efi/gummiboot.c | 5 ++++- > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/src/efi/gummiboot.c b/src/efi/gummiboot.c > index 9f2f31d..32e6f32 100644 > --- a/src/efi/gummiboot.c > +++ b/src/efi/gummiboot.c > @@ -2199,7 +2199,10 @@ EFI_STATUS efi_main(EFI_HANDLE image, EFI_SYSTEM_TABLE > *sys_table) { > config_entry_add_loader_auto(&config, loaded_image->DeviceHandle, > root_dir, loaded_image_path, > L"auto-efi-shell", 's', L"EFI Shell", > L"\\shellx64.efi"); > config_entry_add_loader_auto(&config, loaded_image->DeviceHandle, > root_dir, loaded_image_path, > - L"auto-efi-default", '\0', L"EFI > Default Loader", L"\\EFI\\BOOT\\BOOTX64.EFI"); > + L"auto-efi-default-64", '\0', L"EFI > Default Loader (x64)", L"\\EFI\\BOOT\\BOOTX64.EFI"); > + config_entry_add_loader_auto(&config, loaded_image->DeviceHandle, > root_dir, loaded_image_path, > + L"auto-efi-default-32", '\0', L"EFI > Default Loader (ia32)", L"\\EFI\\BOOT\\BOOTIA32.EFI"); > +
Does it make sense to show both? Can EFI even start the non-native one? Shouldn't we just look for the "native" one, by composing the string at compile time? Kay _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
