On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 1:00 PM, Tom Gundersen <[email protected]> wrote:
> Regarding 
> <http://cgit.freedesktop.org/systemd/systemd/commit/?id=219061dc524368179b2e65cfe91d4d6b23396ba8>:
>
> Would it make sense to use ConditionCapability=CAP_MKNOD instead? This
> would match what is done in systemd-tmpfiles-setup-dev.service. The
> effect is currently the same (I think), but might as well be
> consistent in case things change in the future.

Yeah, as the service is actually creating device nodes, it seems to fit here.

Kay
_______________________________________________
systemd-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel

Reply via email to