On Thursday 2013-07-25 18:52, Lennart Poettering wrote: >On Sun, 21.07.13 06:36, Jan Engelhardt ([email protected]) wrote: >> > >> >I was wondering how much systemd could add to current high >> >availability cluster setups. >> >[...] >> >Does this idea even make sense? Is it too "one systemd to rule them all"? >> >> If it means we can principally get rid of the OCF scripts (they are as >> ugly as sysvinit scripts). However, as always, the "systemd is going to >> be even fatter" argument might come up again if it enlarges >> /usr/lib/systemd/systemd. > >Could you elaborate on what "OCF scripts" precisely are and do?
LSB-like scripts; they implement "start", "stop" and a handful of other actions. Introductory reading material at http://linux-ha.org/wiki/OCF_Resource_Agents . _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
