On Thu, 11.07.13 04:47, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek ([email protected]) wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 03:02:44AM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: > > On Wed, 10.07.13 02:23, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek ([email protected]) > > wrote: > > > > > --- > > > Does this description fit the masterplan? What about units that > > > systemd will expose for CPU and BlockIO shares, will they still be > > > 1024 and 1000 based? > > > > Yes, they will. > Thanks, this clarifies things. > > I think we could introduce additional syntax using %: > CPUShares=15% But what do you do if the percentages don't add up to 100%? We'll probably have another setting CPUBudget= where you can specify a floating point value that specifies the maximum number of CPUs a cgroup can get as hard ceiling. i.e. you could specify CPUBudget=0.33 to grant a cgroup only 1/3 of one CPU at max. Or CPUBudget=3 to grant a cgroup access to full 3 CPUs of CPU time. Lennart -- Lennart Poettering - Red Hat, Inc. _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
