On Sun, Jul 7, 2013 at 11:17 PM, Tom Gundersen <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Umut, > > On Sun, Jul 7, 2013 at 8:11 PM, Umut Tezduyar <[email protected]> wrote: >> Just a suggestion, can kmod-static-nodes.service be merged to >> systemd-static-nodes.service and have 2 ExecStartPre= as: >> >> ExecStartPre=/usr/bin/mkdir -p /run/tmpfiles.d >> ExecStartPre=/usr/bin/kmod static-nodes --format=tmpfiles >> --output=/run/tmpfiles.d/kmod.conf > > Could do, but what would be the benefit? I have no strong objection, > except that in principle they are independent. Hi. I thought they serve for the same purpose. One generates device node information, other one creates the devices. I have no objection either but I thought we have documentation etc ready for systemd-static-nodes.service.
If you are keeping kmod-static-nodes.service, maybe we should consider the configure flag for tmpfile support. If tmpfile support is not enabled, generated device file means nothing, I guess.. Thanks. > > -t _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
