Am 07.04.2013 22:04, schrieb Koen Kooi: > > Op 7 apr. 2013, om 11:47 heeft Reindl Harald <[email protected]> het > volgende geschreven: > >> >> >> Am 07.04.2013 09:56, schrieb Koen Kooi: >>> >>> Op 6 apr. 2013, om 22:41 heeft Reindl Harald <[email protected]> het >>> volgende geschreven: >>>> >>>> Am 06.04.2013 22:37, schrieb Askar Safin: >>>>>> What is "primary arch"? The arch of init? ls? the package manager? >>>>> As far as I know today there is no true symmetric multiarch. Every >>>>> multiarched system has one clear primary arch. And several additional >>>>> arches. So, today (I think) the parameter ARCH should content all arches >>>>> and the primary arch should go first. If this situation changes in the >>>>> future, then ARCH can be list of equal arches. >>>>> >>>>>> usually the kernel ones? >>>>> Yes, this is good idea. But then, of course, this is arch of this >>>>> system's own kernel, not arch of current running kernel. >>>> >>>> i would wonder if this below is not predictable the arch from the running >>>> kernel >>>> >>>> [harry@srv-rhsoft:~]$ /usr/bin/uname -i >>>> x86_64 >>> >>> No, run that kernel on a 32bit Atom cpu and it will still return x86_64 >> >> how will you do that? > > Enable 64 bit support and 32 bit compat, build, boot
bullshit, you can not run a 64bit kernel on a 32bit CPU the other direction yes, but not this way and even if - if your kernel is 64bit than your primary arch is 64 bit
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
