Hi, I also agree that it makes most sense to have it formatted by format_timespan. I don't think we should have 2 different outputs (if on tty). I think it will only be confusing. If no one gets to it before me, I will have it replaced with format_timespan sometime in the close future :).
Thanks. On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 5:58 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek < [email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Apr 05, 2013 at 05:44:34PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: > > On Tue, 02.04.13 18:52, Umut Tezduyar ([email protected]) wrote: > > > > > + if (arg_cpu_type == CPU_PERCENT) > > > + if (g->cpu_valid) > > > + printf(" %6.1f", g->cpu_fraction*100); > > > + else > > > + fputs(" -", stdout); > > > else > > > - fputs(" -", stdout); > > > + printf(" %*"PRIu64, maxtcpu, g->cpu_usage) > > > > I wonder if this is something where format_timespan() would be > > useful? > > > > Or do you want to process this further and thus want a raw value? For > > humans the result of format_timespan() should be a lot more useful > > though... > I think it should use format_timespan() when !on_tty(). It's mostly > unusable now, apart from a slight comic effect: > > / 1109 2070853593984205 - - > - > /user/zbyszek/9 747 0 - - > - > > Zbyszek >
_______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
