On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 4:11 PM, Lennart Poettering <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, 19.03.13 21:34, Auke Kok ([email protected]) wrote: > >> Without this patch, I'm seeing cgroup paths for user sessions with >> both the user name, and the uid created, which can't be intended. >> >> Spotted through user-session-units use. > > Hmm, I am missing something here: where do we generate a cgroup path > with the uid currently? It's all use rname for the cgroup name right, > now, no? What am I missing?
the [email protected] (and thus [email protected] from user-session-units) have: ControlGroup=%R/user/%I/shared cpu:/ ... ControlGroupModify=yes and we've had to symlink the instances as user@<uid>.service since v185 or so.. Now, just from a sanity perspective I really think we should be using uid's here and not usernames, just like /run/user/<uid>... Auke _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
