On Wed, 20.03.13 14:54, William Douglas ([email protected]) wrote: > BUILD_ID is a generic field that can uniquely identify all a > distributions default packages in a release or image build > when VERSION is used as broader identifier.
Hmm, why wouldn't VERSION_ID= be enough for this purpose? We already have VERSION= as "pretty" version string, and VERSION_ID= as low-level computer-readable version, why do we need another? Also, the patch has line breaks in it, can't be merged that way... > > Signed-off-by: William Douglas <[email protected]> > --- > man/os-release.xml | 11 +++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/man/os-release.xml b/man/os-release.xml > index 98320ef..e6f31f7 100644 > --- a/man/os-release.xml > +++ b/man/os-release.xml > @@ -298,6 +298,17 @@ > > <literal>BUG_REPORT_URL="https://bugzilla.redhat.com/";</literal></para></listitem> > </varlistentry> > > + <varlistentry> > + > <term><varname>BUILD_ID=</varname></term> > + > + <listitem><para>A string uniquely > + identifying the packages installed by > + default from a distribution. This field > + is optional. Example: > + > <literal>BUILD_ID="2013-03-20.3"</literal> > + or > <literal>BUILD_ID=201303203</literal>. > + </para></listitem> > + </varlistentry> > > </variablelist> > Lennart -- Lennart Poettering - Red Hat, Inc. _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
