On Tue, 05.03.13 19:29, Lennart Poettering ([email protected]) wrote: > > On Tue, 05.03.13 15:56, Tom Gundersen ([email protected]) wrote: > > > This allows switch-root to work correctly if a unit is active both before > > and > > after the switch-root, but its dependencies change. Before the patch, any > > dependencies added to active units by switch-root will not be pulled, in > > particular filesystems configured in /etc/fstab would not be activated if > > local-fs.target was active in the initrd. > > Yes, this is the intended behaviour of JOB_REPLACE: we will not pull in > dependencies of units which are satisfied anyway. > > > > It is not clear to me if there is a bug in the REPLACE handling, or if it is > > working as expected and that we really want to use ISOLATE instead as this > > patch > > does. > > This might make sense to add. Michal, do you have an opinion on this? I > see no obvious problem with this patch, do you see any?
After checking with Michal I have now merged this patch. Thanks! Lennart -- Lennart Poettering - Red Hat, Inc. _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
