'Twas brillig, and Umut Tezduyar at 12/02/13 12:00 did gyre and gimble: > If I am not mistaken, moving "[email protected]" and "remote-fs.target" > to $systemunitdir will cause them to be shown as "disabled" on > "systemctl status .unit" even though they are enabled. These unit files > have "[Install]" sections and when there is "[Install]" section on them, > systemd will look for a symbolic link in /etc to determine if the unit > is enabled/disabled. > > If the mentioned unit files are moving to $systemunitdir, then their > [Install] section needs to be removed as well so systemd can treat them > as "static" unit files.
Should we not just drop them completely? AFAIK, most distros don't ship those files but instead recreate them in %post install scripts. Certainly, I've created distro-wide rpm-lint rules that prevents any package from shipping any files inside /etc/systemd/system/ (links or real units), and ditto for udev rules etc. I'm very much trying to promote a tidy /etc these days :) Col -- Colin Guthrie gmane(at)colin.guthr.ie http://colin.guthr.ie/ Day Job: Tribalogic Limited http://www.tribalogic.net/ Open Source: Mageia Contributor http://www.mageia.org/ PulseAudio Hacker http://www.pulseaudio.org/ Trac Hacker http://trac.edgewall.org/ _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
