On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 07:34:29PM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Fri, 18.01.13 18:22, Stephan Raue ([email protected]) wrote: > > > > > Am 18.01.2013 18:14, schrieb Colin Walters: > > >On Fri, 2013-01-18 at 16:14 +0100, Stephan Raue wrote: > > > > > >>src/core/manager.c: In function 'manager_setup_time_change': > > >>src/core/manager.c:160:14: error: static assertion failed: > > >>"sizeof(time_t) == sizeof(long)" > > >> assert_cc(sizeof(time_t) == sizeof(long)); > > >> ^ > > >You'll have to dive in here and adjust the code - this assumption is not > > >true on x32. > > > > > > > > this was clear to me, can i get any help with adjusting the code? :-) > > Not sure what the best way is to detect an architecture where time_t is > "long long" rather than "long". I figure there must be some macro we > could check for. If we have that, the code can be changed to: > > #ifdef MACRO_TO_CHECK > assert_cc(sizeof(time_t) == sizeof(long long)); > its.it_value.tv_sec = LONG_LONG_MAX; > #else > assert_cc(sizeof(time_t) == sizeof(long)); > its.it_value.tv_sec = LONG_MAX; > #endif > > i.e. the goal here is to initialize the time_t value that is tv_sec to > the maximum possible value. Fixed that. But then it immediately fails on ../src/core/syscall-list.c :(
Zbyszek _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
