Sorry, I accidentally dropped the ML. On Sun, Jan 6, 2013 at 2:01 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sat, Jan 05, 2013 at 10:58:01PM +0100, Tom Gundersen wrote: >> On Sat, Jan 5, 2013 at 10:30 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> +myhostname-install-exec-hook: >> >> + rm -f $(DESTDIR)$(libdir)/libnss_myhostname.la >> >> + rm -f $(DESTDIR)$(libdir)/libnss_myhostname_minimal.la >> >> + >> >> +myhostname-uninstall-hook: >> >> + rm -f $(DESTDIR)$(libdir)/libnss_myhostname.so.2 >> >> + rm -f $(DESTDIR)$(libdir)/libnss_myhostname_minimal.so.2 >> >> + >> >> +INSTALL_EXEC_HOOKS += \ >> >> + myhostname-install-exec-hook >> >> + >> >> +UNINSTALL_EXEC_HOOKS += \ >> >> + myhostname-uninstall-hook >> >> +endif >> > Are those hooks necessary? Other libs have hooks only if they are >> > moved to rootlibdir during installation. >> >> Good point. The uninstall hook is indeed not necessary, I will remove >> it. The install hook is necessary, or the .la file will be installed. > > Don't the other .la files get installed? Should libnss_myhostname be > different?
This was what the old nss-myhostname did. Lennart: any good reason to exclude the .la or should nss-myhostname be treated the same as the other libs? -t _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
