On Wed, 2012-10-17 at 16:01 -0700, Auke Kok wrote: > The goal of this patch is to get comments on the overall integration > style. Man pages were added to cover the various ways of starting > bootchart: > > - as replacement init process > - as standalone program > - not implemented yet: as early process by systemd > - not implemented yet: as regular systemd service unit
Does it make sense to support all 4 modes? What's the tradeoffs of running it as init versus an early process? Does all of the bootchart code need to be merged in here versus say systemd exporting whatever information is needed, and tightly integrating with it if it exists? The plymouth integration may be a good precedent here. _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
