On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 09:01:00AM +0100, Frederic Crozat wrote: > Le dimanche 23 septembre 2012 à 06:23 +0200, Jan Engelhardt a écrit : > > On Friday 2012-09-07 15:43, Michal Vyskocil wrote > > [http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-factory/2012-09/msg00396.html]: > > > > > >Name: vsftpd-sysv > > >Description: Sysvinit script for vsftpd > > >Supplements: packagageand(sysvinit:vsftpd) > > >Requires: sysvinit > > >Requires: vsftpd > > >Source0: vsftpd.init > > > > It would seem more advantageous to change the systemd package, and > > provide an extra binary there that reuses the parser code to > > give users the possibility to start/stop/restart programs using > > unit files in a non-systemd environment. > > . > > First, I don't see the point of doing a separate package at all for > sysvinit compatibility.
Hi, The separate package will split the responsibility from regular openSUSE maintainer/packager when systemd will be the only one possibility. I personally see no value in shipping unused sysv script once sysv will be deprecated. > > Second, if people want to use .service, they should use systemd. I don't > want us to spend time in doing some strange backport from one new > technology to another one when plan to drop. AFACS Debian plans to have some .service -> init scripts converter, but that is a job for people willing to maintain sysvinit. Regards Michal Vyskocil _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
