On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 7:09 PM, Lennart Poettering <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, 08.08.12 19:06, Kay Sievers ([email protected]) wrote: > >> >> On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 7:02 PM, Lennart Poettering >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> > On Mon, 06.08.12 11:43, shawn ([email protected]) wrote: >> > >> >> - case '?': >> >> - return -EINVAL; >> >> - >> >> default: >> >> - log_error("Unknown option code %c", c); >> >> + log_error("Unknown option code '%c'", c); >> >> return -EINVAL; >> >> } >> > >> > Hmm, but this would result in one message by getopt() itself and one by >> > us in case the user uses an unknown switch, no? >> > >> > I'd like to turn off that getopt() internal message, but I am not sure >> > there is a way.... >> >> leading : in optstring? > > Nah, that just changes whether '?' is returned as error char.
Nah, it also suppresses the error. Kay _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
