On 07/29/2012 11:58 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Fri, 27.07.12 20:46, Dave Reisner ([email protected]) wrote: > >> Instead of making systemd-udevd a so-link to systemd-udevd.service, >> ship the real page as systemd-udevd to integrate better with distros >> where udevd might be run standalone. > > Sorry, but no. Hi, sorry for committing this, I didn't think it would be controversial.
> We name all the service man pages after the service name, since that is > how people will primarily come in contact with it (i.e. they'll do > "systemctl start systemd-udevd.service", but never run > /usr/lib/systemd/systemd-udevd directly). > > We design this stuff so that it is nicely integrated and uniform in its > behaviour. We'll not depart from that because people who don't use > systemd might be confused. I'm not interested in installing without systemd myself, but I still don't think this is a bad idea: the change is transparent in current default installation (if we ignore the change in the title of a manpage), and apparently it helps people who install without systemd. Zbyszek _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
