On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 7:47 AM, Kay Sievers <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 12:39 PM, Lennart Poettering > <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Tue, 17.07.12 17:14, Shawn Landden ([email protected]) wrote: > >> Hmm, so I am not completely opposed to this (though I also don't see the >> big benefit). But before we merge anything like this: I think the >> externally visible headers (i.e. the ones above) should really continue >> to use the classic #ifdef guards. For the externally used headers we >> should try hard to make them as "compatible" as we can. That includes >> the C++ external foo, but also not using any fancy C99 features or >> #pragmas. >> >> Kay, Michal, do you have any strong opinion on this? > > I don't care much. > > But I like the "experiment", it looks like a nice way doing that. > Sounds fine to me to try with all the internal stuff, but not the > libs.
I'd like to see this experiment, too. I'll probably do that to kmod and see what happens. Lucas De Marchi _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
