On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 02:15:40PM -0400, Kristian Høgsberg wrote: > On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 12:22:13PM -0400, Casey Dahlin wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 09, 2012 at 06:17:13PM -0400, Kristian Høgsberg wrote: > > > No, wayland is the protocol, weston is the compositor building > > > toolkit. If you want an EGL compositor on KMS with evdev input, you > > > > But we don't want an EGL compositor. We want bare-bones KMS support. > > > > One of the things he mentioned was replacing plymouth with the system > > compositor. Do you really want to pack mesa into the initrd? > > > > The system compositor needs to provide a lightweight SHM-only graphics > > stack. It also needs to be able to provide the EGL stack /dynamically/ > > when the rest of userspace becomes available. > > Yes, so what you want is an EGL/KMS/evdev compositor that can start > out only using sw compositing. How is that *smaller* than weston > again? >
Good point, I suppose. If you count the module that eventually gets plugged in to it, it would be a bit bigger. --CJD _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
